Microwavenews.com, “IARC: Cell Phone Radiation Is a Possible Human Carcinogen” , 3 June 2011, updated 25 November 2015,
Meyl, Konstantin, DNA and Cell Resonance, INDEL, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany, 2011, 2nd ed., p. 39
Havas, Magda, “Safe Baby Monitors“, 24 November 2015,
EHT, “Children and Wireless FAGs“,
Havas, Magda, “Open Letter to Parents, Teachers, School Boards Regarding Wi-Fi Networks in Schools“, 2 May 2012, quote in Open Letter of 5 May 2009,
Milham, Samuel, MD, and L. Lloyd Morgan, “A New Electromagnetic Exposure Metric: High Frequency Voltage Transients Associated with Increased Cancer Incidence in Teachers in a California School“, American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2008; 51 :579-586,
Hardell, Lennart and Michael Carlberg, “Using the Hill viewpoints from 1965 for evaluating strengths of evidence of the risk for brain tumors associated with use of mobile and cordless phones“, Rev. Environ. Health 2013; 28(2-3):97-106
Dr. Magda Havas, PhD Pagina tuttostoria
Blank, Martin, video at http://www.emfscientist.org
2,300 studies by the US Navy showing biological impacts of EMF: Naval Medical Research Institute 2300 Studies on EMF Health Effects
2016 NTP study preliminary results showing that cell phone radiation causes cancer in rats. This $25 million study is the gold standard of EMF research and makes it clear that our current wireless safety standards do not adequately protect the public.
2015 study showing 2.4 GHz WiFi decreases sperm function. Researchers conclude that “there should be a major concern regarding the exposure to Wi-Fi networks existing in the vicinity of our living places.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4503846/
German report on 878 Russian studies from 1960-1997 regarding the health effects of EMF. This report was buried by the German government as soon as it was published because of the consequences of its findings.
“Captured Agency” report on how the FCC is completely dominated by the wireless industry that it supposedly regulates. Published June 2015 by investigative journalist Norm Alster and the Harvard University Center for Ethics. Mr. Alster also wrote about the Dot Com Crash and the 2008 Financial Crisis before they happened. Click for free PDF or Kindle versions.
Declassified 1976 Defense Intelligence Agency report showing that military personnel exposed to non-thermal microwave radiation experienced “headaches, fatigue, dizziness, irritability, sleeplessness, depression, anxiety, forgetfulness and lack of concentration.” Defense Intelligence Agency 1976 Report on Biological Effects of EMF
The UK Chief Medical Officers advise that “children and young people under 16 should be encouraged to use mobile phones for essential purposes only, and to keep calls short.” NHS, 2011
Havas, Magda, “When theory and observation collide: Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer? “, Environmental Pollution 2017 Feb; 219:501-505,
Blank, Martin, presentation at The Commonwealth Club of California program, “The Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields“, 18 November 2010,
Mercola, Joseph, MD, “Caution: Cell Phone Use Can Double Your Risk of Getting a Brain Tumor“, 19 January 2011,
Pall, Martin L., PhD, “Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects “, J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2013 Aug; 17(8):958-965,
Davanipour, Zoreh, DVM, PhD, and Eugene Sobel, PhD, The Biolnitiative 2012 Report, Section 13, “ELF MF – Melatonin Production – Alzheimer’s Disease and Breast Cancer“, p. 16,
Genuis, Stephen J., “Fielding a current idea: exploring the public health impact of electromagnetic radiation“, Public Health 2008 Feb; 122(2): 113-124,
Herbert, Martha R. and Cindy Sage, “Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a pathophysiological inK“, Pathophysiology 2013; 20(3): 191-209,211-234,
The recent US $30 million study of radio frequency radiation on animals shows “clear evidence” of cancer. NTP, 2018
Pilla, A.A., “Electromagnetic fields instantaneously modulate nitric oxide signaling in cha longed biological systems“, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012 Sep28; 426(3):330-33
A research article by Dr. Carl Blackman showing that frequency modulation (not the carrier wave) is the primary reason for non-thermal biological effects: Dr. Carl Blackman Modulation 2009 Paper
2015 study showing that 2.4 GHz WiFi may be accepted as one of the major risk factors for brain tumours and other neurodegenerative diseases: Effects of 2.4 GHz WiFi on microRNA Brain Tissue
Harvard Pediatric Neurologist states the dangers of Wi-Fi in classrooms and potential autism link: Harvard Pediatrician EMF Dangers for Children
Comprehensive German data bank of global EMF research showing biological effects of RF/EMF: http://www.emf-portal.de
2015 paper showing that polarized EMF (man-made) is much more biologically active than non-polarized EMF (natural sources such as infrared, ultraviolet and visible light from the sun): http://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914
2015 paper showing that rabbits experience heart arrhythmia and increased blood pressure when exposed with 2.4 GHz WiFi: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1382668915300594
A long-term study from Swedish scientist Lennart Hardell (published October 2014) on glioma and acoustic neuroma brain tumours showing that RF is carcinogenic. The scientist calls for RF to be labelled an IARC Class 1 Carcinogen (meaning definitely carcinogenic to humans) and recommends an urgent revision to safety guidelines. http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(14)00064-9/fulltext
2011 study by Nora Volkow showing that cell phone radiation increases brain glucose metabolism in areas next to the antenna. Increased glucose metabolism is associated with cancer. A study shows that biological changes occur at levels lower than FCC guidelines. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184892/
2015 Study by leading industry RF scientist shows that 3G GSM cell phone technology causes cancer in animals: http://www.microwavenews.com/news-center/rf-animal-cancer-promotion
2002 letter from EPA stating that FCC guidelines do not cover long-term, chronic, non-thermal microwave radiation exposures (that which we are exposed to every day by consumer wireless devices). It confirms that FCC guidelines only relate to damage from heating (thermal) effects: EPA Letter Stating FCC Guideliness are only based on Thermal Effects
The mechanism for non-thermal EMF cellular damage confirmed: EMF Effects via Voltage Gated Calcium Channels Dr Martin Pall
The above graphic shows the mechanism by which EMF can cause DNA damage without the heating (thermal) effect of cells. This mechanism was found in 17 different studies and is essentially a smoking-gun that shows EMF can cause serious damage at levels far below government safety standards.
2012 BioInitiative Report – References 1,900 new studies showing biological impacts from non-thermal EMF: http://www.bioinitiative.org/
Sperm damage was found in 21 of 27 studies reviewed in this 2016 meta-study. Multiple studies in this group also found DNA within the sperm. The mechanism is thought to be mitochondria dysfunction leading to elevated ROS production.
2014 Japanese study showing a significant decrease in clinical symptoms of building residents once the cell tower was removed from the location.
World Health Organization and IARC classifies microwave radiation as a “possible carcinogen” – May 31, 2011: http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf
Sufficient evidence exists for microwave radiation to be labelled a definite carcinogen (presentation by Dr. Anthony Miller): http://smartgridawareness.org/2013/12/04/rf-fields-possibly-probably-or-definitely-carcinogenic/
Internal FDA memo from 1993 states that data “strongly suggests” that microwave radiation promotes cancer: http://www.goaegis.com/fda0203.html
Swisscom admits elevated risk of cancer and genetic damage from Wi-Fi: http://www.safeschool.ca/Swisscom__WiFi_Harms.html
Motorola has “war-gamed” the science since 1994: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/devra-davis-phd/cell-phones-brain-cancer_b_3232534.html
Nokia has held patents since 1998 that would reduce the irradiation of cell phone users – but did not utilize the technology: http://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2014/10/20/former-nokia-ctos-multiple-sclerosis-and-nokias-patents-to-prevent-it/
Ford Motor Company commissioned this study in 1965 which shows the numerous damaging biological effects of microwave radiation. It notes in particular how damaging microwave radiation is to the central nervous system.
1994 U.S. Air Force study confirming existence of non-thermal EMF effects, including alterations to the central nervous system and the cardiovascular system: Air Force Study showing non-thermal effects
This video shows the biological impact of FCC guidelines that do not consider the non-thermal effects of EMF pollution.
Dr. Paul Dart gives smart meter presentation outlining how inadequate FCC rules regulating microwave radiation are: http://smartgridawareness.org/2013/11/24/oregon-eweb-votes-for-opt-in-for-smart-meters/
Australian study showing the health effects of wireless smart meters: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478801
Survey of 210 respondents whose health was harmed by smart meters: http://www.mainecoalitiontostopsmartmeters.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Exhibit-10-Smart-Meter-Health-Effects-Report-Survey2.pdf
52 Medical Doctors and Researchers respond to industry PR that “smart” meters are safe: https://maisonsaine.ca/sante-et-securite/electrosmog/smart-meters-correcting-gross-misinformation.html
Red blood cells are affected by microwave radiation from wireless smart meters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4JDEspdx58
Report warning about Smart Meters by Santa Cruz Public Health Advisor, Poki Namkung, MD: http://emfsafetynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Health-Risks-Associated-With-SmartMeters.pdf
UK Department of Health concerned about cancer risks associated with wireless “smart” meters: http://www.clickgreen.org.uk/news/national-news/121825-decc-confirms-talks-with-dept-of-health-over-smart-meter-risks.html
A graph with 67 studies that show health effects well below government limits and the corresponding effects of smart meters – See the following PDF, as well as the graphic:
The above graphic shows that 67 peer-reviewed, repeated studies show significant health issues (e.g. cancer, tumours, infertility) at levels far below the government safety standards (grey line). The yellow line is what the standards should be if public safety is considered.
Brain cancer rates have doubled in Denmark for the past 10 years: http://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/spike-brain-cancer-denmark
Swedish brain cancer rates have increased by 30% since 2008: http://www.stralskyddsstiftelsen.se/2014/10/increase-brain-tumors/
Thousands of studies showing links between EMF pollution and biological effects: http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/studies.asp
1981 NASA paper showing numerous health effects from non-thermal electromagnetic fields. NASA report on EMF effects on the human body
“Electromagnetism and Life” book by Robert O. Becker: Robert O. Becker and Andrew A. Marino 1982 Electromagnetism and Life
Collection of over 6,000 studies showing biological impacts from EMF pollution: http://justproveit.net/studies
Journal of Neuroscience double-blind study showing evidence of electro-hypersensitivity (EHS): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21793784
Proposed statement on electromagnetic hypersensitivity by the European Economic and Social Committee: http://www.iemfa.org/wp-content/pdf/EESC-TEN559.pdf
A study shows Secondhand Radiation from Cell Phones is Considerable: http://emfsafetynetwork.org/?p=8621
Rebuttal by Dr. Carlo on the recent Danish cell phone study that states cell phones are safe: http://www.emf-health.com/reports-drcarlo-danishstudy.htm
A new study calls for cell phone radiation to be considered human carcinogen: http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/10/10790
Italian Supreme Court rules that brain tumour is caused by cell phone: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/9619514/Mobile-phones-can-cause-brain-tumours-court-rules..html
Children’s brains absorb much higher amounts of microwave radiation than adults because of their thinner skulls. Their nervous systems are also easily damaged by EMF because they do not yet have the protection afforded by nerve cell myelination.
Summary of how EMF pollution affects each system of our body: http://emractionday.org/science
Use of fluorescent lighting leading to an increase in eye disease in developed countries: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222423/
Bee Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) can be partially explained by the increased microwave radiation in our environment from wireless technologies the past decade – a new study out of Switzerland: http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/?page_id=672
Governments and organizations that ban or warn against wireless technology: http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/?page_id=128
Chart showing numerous health effects from the laptop and iPad radiation: http://www.wifiinschools.com/science.html
Dr. Franz Adlkofer – Austrian Reflex Study showing genetic damage from cell phone microwave radiation – results were suppressed (see following video and Reflex graphics): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9ycyWd8GMs
This study from Austria shows that 24 hours of mobile phone radiation causes as much DNA damage as 1,600 chest x-rays. The results were so damaging to the wireless industry that the scientist, Dr. Franz Aldkofer, was attacked from many angles. The results still stand though.
High school students in Denmark show how Wi-Fi affects biology: http://mastsanity.org/health-52/research/324-experiments-with-cress-in-9th-grade-attracts-international-attention-denmark-16th
Research on the health effects of cell phone masts/towers: http://www.respectpdx.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=5&Itemid=6
10 of 14 studies who significant biological effects from living next to a cell phone tower: Click here for studies.
Peer-reviewed, double-blind studies showing that electro-sensitivity is caused by wireless technologies: http://www.magdahavas.com/microwave-radiation-affects-the-heart-are-the-results-real-or-are-they-due-to-interference/ & http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/cordless-heart/
Smart Meters – Separating Fact from Fiction: http://www.es-uk.info/news/2012-02-10-fact-from-fiction.pdf
American Society of Environmental Medicine warns of health effects from EMF and RF radiation: http://aaemonline.org/emf_rf_position.html
This presentation by Dr. Martin Pall in Norway November 2014 shows that our understanding of the health effects of weak EMF’s is about to completely change.
A possible solution for radiation
Watch Dr. Marco Ruggiero talk about a possible solution for all kinds of radiation (from 27:30)
Mobile phone radiation and health risks
Mobile phone use and glioma risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ming Yang,#1 WenWen Guo,#2 ChunSheng Yang,#3 JianQin Tang,4 Qian Huang,2 ShouXin Feng,1,* AiJun Jiang,1XiFeng Xu,1 and Guan Jiang4,*
Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adams JA1, Galloway TS1, Mondal D1, Esteves SC2, Mathews F3.
Top books on electromagnetic pollution
Blank, Martin, PhD, Overpowered: What Science Tells Us About the Dangers of Cell Phones and Other WiFi-Age Devices, Seven Stories Press, New York, 2014
Becker, Robert 0., MD, Cross Currents: The Promise of Electromedicine, the Perils of Electropollution, Tarcher, New York, 1990
In Sweden, neurosurgeon Leif Salford showed that a cell phone disrupts the blood-brain barrier within two minutes, and causes brain damage within two hours
In India, zoologist Neelima Kumar proved that a ten-minute exposure to a cell phone rendered honey bees completely unable to metabolize their food
In Spain, biologist Alfonso Balmori raised tadpoles on an apartment terrace near a cell tower. When shielded from the radiation, they all thrived; when exposed to the cell tower, the tadpoles all died
Top organisations doing research in EMFs and electro-smog
USA & Canada
EMF Safety Network
Smart Grid Awareness
Citizens for Safe Technology
Take Back Your Power
The Ecological Options Network
EMR Policy Institute
Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
Environmental Health Trust