Summary of Feng Shui: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience (Science: Philosophy, History and Education) by Michael R. Matthews

Posted on by

“Feng Shui: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience” by Michael R. Matthews is an in-depth exploration of Feng Shui, examining its historical, cultural, philosophical, and educational dimensions. The book aims to debunk the scientific pretensions of Feng Shui while highlighting its value as a pedagogical tool for teaching about the nature of science and the demarcation between science and pseudoscience. For feng shui enthusiasts, researchers, feng shui consultants, and students, this book is a must for being well-educated in the history of feng shui and its claims. Highly recommended. It’s the perfect companion to this book: Scientific Feng Shui for the Built Environment: Theories and Applications (Enhanced New Edition) by Michael Y. Mak, Albert T. So (2015)

Michael R. Matthews is an honorary associate professor in the School of Education at the University of New South Wales, known for his significant contributions to the fields of philosophy of education, history and philosophy of science, and science education. His academic journey began with an interest in philosophy during his high school years, leading to a distinguished career in academia. More: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_R._Matthews

Key Themes and Structure

Part I: Educational Responsibilities and Opportunities

  • Introduction to Feng Shui: Matthews introduces Feng Shui, explaining its principles and its aversion to empirical testing.
  • Cultural Contribution of Science Education: This section discusses the role of science education in shaping worldviews, promoting scientific attitudes, and addressing unscientific beliefs. It emphasises the cultural responsibility of school science programs to foster scientific literacy and critical thinking.
  • Prevalence of Unscientific Beliefs: Matthews explores the spectrum of unwarranted beliefs, including superstition and pseudoscience, particularly in Asian cultures.
  • Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking: The book underscores the importance of teaching students the scientific habit of mind, critical evidential support, and the historical context of scientific development.

Part II: Feng Shui: Its Theory and Practice

  • Feng Shui and Chi: This section delves into the Daoist origins of Feng Shui, its historical development, and its cosmological and scientific claims.
  • Educational Value: Matthews argues for the educational value of studying Feng Shui, moving from current best science to earlier, now-rejected science, and finally to pseudoscience. This approach helps students understand the evolution of scientific thought and the criteria for scientific validity.

For the full content of the book, go to Google Books: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=juijDwAAQBAJ&printsec=copyright&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Conclusion: The book concludes by reaffirming the importance of using Feng Shui as a case study to teach about the nature of science, the process of scientific inquiry, and the distinction between science and pseudoscience.

Critical Reception
The book has been praised by scholars for its thorough analysis and educational significance:

  • Harvey Siegel from the University of Miami commends it as a tour de force that helps students understand the interaction between science and culture.
  • Michael Ruse from Florida State University highlights its erudition and fluid style, noting its paradigm-making potential for science education.
  • James Alcock from York University and Wang Youjun from Shanghai Normal University both recognise its contribution to the history and philosophy of science and science education.
  • Sibel Erduran from the University of Oxford and Chen-Yung Lin from National Taiwan Normal University emphasise its relevance for science curriculum designers and educators.
  • Bangping Ding from Capital Normal University and Yao Dazhi from the Chinese Academy of Sciences also acknowledge its importance in addressing the demarcation problem between science and pseudoscience.

Overall, “Feng Shui: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience” is a significant work that provides valuable insights into the educational use of Feng Shui to promote scientific literacy and critical thinking among students, feng shui consultants and scientists.

What are the main arguments Matthews uses to debunk Feng Shui as a pseudoscience

Michael R. Matthews presents several key arguments to debunk feng shui as a pseudoscience in his book “Feng Shui: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience”:

  1. Lack of Empirical Testing: Matthews highlights feng shui’s aversion to empirical testing, which is a fundamental aspect of scientific inquiry. This reluctance to subject its claims to rigorous scientific examination is a major indicator of pseudoscience.
  2. Absence of Scientific Methodology: The book emphasises that feng shui does not adhere to scientific methods of observation, experimentation, and validation. This lack of scientific rigour is a crucial factor in classifying it as a pseudoscience.
  3. Lack of Self-Criticism: Matthews points out that feng shui practitioners and theorists do not engage in self-criticism or sceptical examination of their own beliefs and practices. This absence of critical self-reflection is contrary to the scientific approach.
  4. Unjustified Continuity: The author argues that feng shui’s continued promotion as a science or scientific practice in modern times, despite the availability of more scientifically grounded alternatives, contributes to its classification as a pseudoscience.
  5. Failure to Meet Scientific Criteria: Matthews demonstrates that feng shui lacks at least 33 out of 36 properties of science featured in a demarcatory list, while only possessing three. This significant discrepancy strongly indicates its non-scientific nature.
  6. Reliance on Unverifiable Concepts: The book discusses feng shui’s dependence on concepts like “qi” (cosmic energy) and other metaphysical ideas that are not amenable to scientific testing or verification.
  7. Inconsistency Among Practitioners: Matthews addresses the lack of consistency in feng shui practices, with different practitioners often providing conflicting advice, which is inconsistent with scientific consensus.
  8. Historical and Cultural Context: While acknowledging feng shui’s cultural significance, Matthews argues that its continued promotion as a science in the modern era, despite scientific advancements, contributes to its pseudoscientific status.

What specific examples does Matthews use to show Feng Shui’s lack of scientific testing

Based on his extensive analysis, Matthews provides several specific examples to demonstrate feng shui’s lack of scientific testing:

  1. Aversion to Empirical Testing: Matthews highlights that feng shui practitioners generally exhibit a reluctance to subject their claims to rigorous scientific examination. This avoidance of empirical testing is a significant indicator of pseudoscientific practice.
  2. Lack of Systematic Observation and Experimentation: The book emphasises that feng shui does not engage in systematic scientific observation or experimentation, which are fundamental components of the scientific method. This absence is a critical shortcoming.
  3. Failure to Disentangle Variables: Matthews points out that feng shui practitioners make no effort to disentangle variables and study their individual contributions. Such analysis is essential for scientific rigour, allowing for a clearer understanding of causality.
  4. Cherry-Picking of Results: The author argues that feng shui practitioners often engage in cherry-picking, selecting only those results that appear to support their claims while ignoring contradictory evidence. This selective use of data undermines the credibility of their assertions.
  5. Use of Unfounded Immunising Stratagems: Matthews notes that when faced with disconfirming evidence, feng shui practitioners frequently resort to unfounded explanations to shield their beliefs from falsification. This tactic is a hallmark of pseudoscience.
  6. Lack of Self-Criticism: The book highlights that feng shui theoreticians and practitioners do not engage in self-critical examination of their own beliefs and practices. This absence of internal critique is contrary to the scientific approach, which values scepticism and self-reflection.
  7. Inconsistency Among Practitioners: Matthews addresses the lack of consistency in feng shui practices, with different practitioners often providing conflicting advice. This inconsistency is indicative of a lack of standardisation and reliability.
  8. Misuse of Scientific Terms: The author points out that feng shui often uses scientific terms without regard for their actual scientific meanings. This misuse leads to external inconsistencies and further undermines its scientific credibility.
  9. Stagnation in the Face of Contradictory Evidence: Matthews argues that feng shui remains unchanged despite evidence that contradicts its claims. Unlike scientific theories, which evolve based on new evidence, feng shui persists unchanged, illustrating its resistance to scientific progress.

These examples collectively demonstrate feng shui’s failure to adhere to scientific principles of testing, observation, and critical analysis, supporting Matthews’ argument for classifying it as a pseudoscience.

What are the examples of Feng Shui practitioners misusing scientific terms

Michael R. Matthews provides several examples of feng shui practitioners misusing scientific terms without regard for their actual scientific meanings. These examples illustrate how feng shui employs scientific-sounding language to lend credibility to its practices, despite lacking scientific validation:

  1. Qi (Chi): Feng shui relies heavily on the concept of “qi,” described as a movable positive or negative life force. This term is used in ways that suggest it has a tangible, measurable impact on the environment and human well-being, despite there being no empirical evidence or scientific basis for such claims.
  2. Electromagnetic Fields: Some feng shui practitioners claim that the placement of objects can influence electromagnetic fields in a way that affects health and fortune. These claims are often made without any scientific backing or understanding of how electromagnetic fields actually work.
  3. Misuse of Compass Directions: Feng shui uses the compass to determine favourable locations for properties. Critics point out that the compass readings are often inaccurate due to solar winds disturbing the Earth’s electromagnetic field, a nuance that feng shui practitioners either ignore or misunderstand.
  4. Scientific Terminology without Rigorous Definition: Feng shui practitioners often use terms like “energy,” “vibrations,” and “fields” in ways that sound scientific but lack precise definitions or measurable parameters, leading to external inconsistencies with established scientific knowledge.

These examples highlight how feng shui appropriates scientific language to create an illusion of scientific legitimacy while failing to adhere to the principles and methods of scientific inquiry.

By presenting these arguments, Matthews aims to demonstrate that while feng shui may have cultural value, it does not meet the criteria of a scientific discipline and should be classified as a pseudoscience.

Potential Areas of Critique of “Feng Shui: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience” by Michael R. Matthews

Several areas of critique can be identified regarding Michael R. Matthews’ analysis of feng shui:

  1. Scope and Relevance: Certain sections of the book contain extraneous information not directly related to feng shui or its classification as a pseudoscience. This implies that a more rigorous editorial process could have streamlined the content, enhancing its relevance and focus.
  2. Lack of Practitioner Perspective: It is not clear whether Matthews extensively interviewed or engaged with feng shui practitioners. Critics might argue that this lack of direct interaction results in an incomplete understanding of the methods and reasoning employed by practitioners, potentially overlooking nuanced aspects of their practices.
  3. Western-Centric Approach: While Matthews addresses the historical and cultural aspects of feng shui, his analysis primarily reflects a Western scientific perspective. Critics could argue that this viewpoint may not fully account for the cultural context and philosophical foundations of feng shui, which developed within a distinctly different epistemological framework.
  4. Omission from Pseudoscience Literature: Matthews notes that feng shui is often omitted from discussions of pseudoscience in academic literature. Critics might interpret this omission as an indication that feng shui may not be as significant a pseudoscience as Matthews asserts, questioning the prioritisation of feng shui in his critique.
  5. Potential Bias: Given Matthews’ background in science education and philosophy of science, some may argue that his approach is inherently biased towards a scientific worldview. This bias might lead to an underappreciation of the cultural or philosophical dimensions of feng shui, which could be seen as integral to a comprehensive evaluation.
  6. Educational Focus: The book’s emphasis on using feng shui as a teaching tool for science education could be perceived as instrumentalising a cultural practice for Western educational purposes. Critics might view this approach as reductive, potentially diminishing the cultural significance of feng shui by framing it primarily as an example of pseudoscience for pedagogical use.

By considering these critiques, one can gain a more nuanced understanding of the potential limitations and biases present in Matthews’ analysis of feng shui.

You can preview this book on Google Books: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=juijDwAAQBAJ&printsec=copyright&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

You can get this book on Amazon: https://amzn.eu/d/01nMr5eW

Posted in Feng Shui Books.