2,300 studies by the US Navy showing biological impacts of EMF: Naval Medical Research Institute 2300 Studies on EMF Health Effects

2016 NTP study preliminary results showing that cell phone radiation causes cancer in rats. This $25 million study is the gold standard of EMF research and makes it clear that our current wireless safety standards do not adequately protect the public.

2015 study showing 2.4 GHz WiFi decreases sperm function. Researchers conclude that “there should be a major concern regarding the exposure to Wi-Fi networks existing in the vicinity of our living places.”  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4503846/

German report on 878 Russian studies from 1960-1997 regarding the health effects of EMF. This report was buried by the German government as soon as it was published because of the consequences of its findings.

“Captured Agency” report on how the FCC is completely dominated by the wireless industry that it supposedly regulates. Published June 2015 by investigative journalist Norm Alster and the Harvard University Center for Ethics. Mr. Alster also wrote about the Dot Com Crash and the 2008 Financial Crisis before they happened. Click for free PDF or Kindle versions.

Declassified 1976 Defense Intelligence Agency report showing that military personnel exposed to non-thermal microwave radiation experienced “headaches, fatigue, dizziness, irritability, sleeplessness, depression, anxiety, forgetfulness and lack of concentration.” Defense Intelligence Agency 1976 Report on Biological Effects of EMF

The UK Chief Medical Officers advise that “children and young people under 16 should be encouraged to use mobile phones for essential purposes only, and to keep calls short.” NHS, 2011

EMFscientist.org, ” International Appeal : Scientists Call For Protection from Non-Ionising Electromagnetic Field Exposure” ,

Havas, Magda, “When theory and observation collide: Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer? “, Environmental Pollution 2017 Feb; 219:501-505,

Blank, Martin, presentation at The Commonwealth Club of California program, “The Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields“, 18 November 2010,

Mercola, Joseph, MD, “Caution: Cell Phone Use Can Double Your Risk of Getting a Brain Tumor“, 19 January 2011,

Pall, Martin L., PhD, “Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects “, J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2013 Aug; 17(8):958-965,

Davanipour, Zoreh, DVM, PhD, and Eugene Sobel, PhD, The Biolnitiative 2012 Report, Section 13, “ELF MF – Melatonin Production – Alzheimer’s Disease and Breast Cancer“, p. 16,

Genuis, Stephen J., “Fielding a current idea: exploring the public health impact of electromagnetic radiation“, Public Health 2008 Feb; 122(2): 113-124,

Herbert, Martha R. and Cindy Sage, “Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a pathophysiological inK“, Pathophysiology 2013; 20(3): 191-209,211-234,

Pall, Martin L., “The Autism Epidemic is Caused by EMFs, Acting via Calcium Channels and Chemicals Acting via NMDA-Rs: Downstream Effects Cause Autism” , video at http://www.donnafisher.net

Pall, Martin L., “Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression”

The recent US $30 million study of radio frequency radiation on animals shows “clear evidence” of cancer. NTP, 2018

Pilla, A.A., “Electromagnetic fields instantaneously modulate nitric oxide signaling in cha longed biological systems“, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012 Sep28; 426(3):330-33

Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low-intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective. Belpomme D¹, Hardell L², Belyaev I³, Burgio E⁴, Carpenter DO⁵

Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children. Gandhi OP¹, Morgan LL, de Salles AA, Han YY, Herberman RB, Davis DL

A research article by Dr. Carl Blackman showing that frequency modulation (not the carrier wave) is the primary reason for non-thermal biological effects: Dr. Carl Blackman Modulation 2009 Paper

2015 study showing that 2.4 GHz WiFi may be accepted as one of the major risk factors for brain tumours and other neurodegenerative diseases: Effects of 2.4 GHz WiFi on microRNA Brain Tissue

Harvard Pediatric Neurologist states the dangers of Wi-Fi in classrooms and potential autism link: Harvard Pediatrician EMF Dangers for Children

Comprehensive German data bank of global EMF research showing biological effects of RF/EMF: http://www.emf-portal.de

2015 paper showing that polarized EMF (man-made) is much more biologically active than non-polarized EMF (natural sources such as infrared, ultraviolet and visible light from the sun):  http://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914

2015 paper showing that rabbits experience heart arrhythmia and increased blood pressure when exposed with 2.4 GHz WiFi:  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1382668915300594

A long-term study from Swedish scientist Lennart Hardell (published October 2014) on glioma and acoustic neuroma brain tumours showing that RF is carcinogenic. The scientist calls for RF to be labelled an IARC Class 1 Carcinogen  (meaning definitely carcinogenic to humans) and recommends an urgent revision to safety guidelines.  http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(14)00064-9/fulltext

2011 study by Nora Volkow showing that cell phone radiation increases brain glucose metabolism in areas next to the antenna. Increased glucose metabolism is associated with cancer. A study shows that biological changes occur at levels lower than FCC guidelines. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184892/

2015 Study by leading industry RF scientist shows that 3G GSM cell phone technology causes cancer in animals:   http://www.microwavenews.com/news-center/rf-animal-cancer-promotion

2002 letter from EPA stating that FCC guidelines do not cover long-term, chronic, non-thermal microwave radiation exposures (that which we are exposed to every day by consumer wireless devices). It confirms that FCC guidelines only relate to damage from heating (thermal) effects: EPA Letter Stating FCC Guideliness are only based on Thermal Effects

The mechanism for non-thermal EMF cellular damage confirmed: EMF Effects via Voltage Gated Calcium Channels Dr Martin Pall

The above graphic shows the mechanism by which EMF can cause DNA damage without the heating (thermal) effect of cells. This mechanism was found in 17 different studies and is essentially a smoking-gun that shows EMF can cause serious damage at levels far below government safety standards.

2012 BioInitiative Report – References 1,900 new studies showing biological impacts from non-thermal EMF: http://www.bioinitiative.org/

Sperm damage was found in 21 of 27 studies reviewed in this 2016 meta-study. Multiple studies in this group also found DNA within the sperm. The mechanism is thought to be mitochondria dysfunction leading to elevated ROS production.

2014 Japanese study showing a significant decrease in clinical symptoms of building residents once the cell tower was removed from the location.

World Health Organization and IARC classifies microwave radiation as a “possible carcinogen” – May 31, 2011: http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf

Sufficient evidence exists for microwave radiation to be labelled a definite carcinogen (presentation by Dr. Anthony Miller): http://smartgridawareness.org/2013/12/04/rf-fields-possibly-probably-or-definitely-carcinogenic/

Internal FDA memo from 1993 states that data “strongly suggests” that microwave radiation promotes cancer:  http://www.goaegis.com/fda0203.html

Swisscom admits elevated risk of cancer and genetic damage from Wi-Fi: http://www.safeschool.ca/Swisscom__WiFi_Harms.html

Motorola has “war-gamed” the science since 1994: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/devra-davis-phd/cell-phones-brain-cancer_b_3232534.html

Nokia has held patents since 1998 that would reduce the irradiation of cell phone users – but did not utilize the technology: http://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2014/10/20/former-nokia-ctos-multiple-sclerosis-and-nokias-patents-to-prevent-it/

Ford Motor Company commissioned this study in 1965 which shows the numerous damaging biological effects of microwave radiation. It notes in particular how damaging microwave radiation is to the central nervous system.

1994 U.S. Air Force study confirming existence of non-thermal EMF effects, including alterations to the central nervous system and the cardiovascular system: Air Force Study showing non-thermal effects

This video shows the biological impact of FCC guidelines that do not consider the non-thermal effects of EMF pollution.

Dr. Paul Dart gives smart meter presentation outlining how inadequate FCC rules regulating microwave radiation are: http://smartgridawareness.org/2013/11/24/oregon-eweb-votes-for-opt-in-for-smart-meters/

Australian study showing the health effects of wireless smart meters:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478801

Survey of 210 respondents whose health was harmed by smart meters: http://www.mainecoalitiontostopsmartmeters.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Exhibit-10-Smart-Meter-Health-Effects-Report-Survey2.pdf

52 Medical Doctors and Researchers respond to industry PR that “smart” meters are safe: https://maisonsaine.ca/sante-et-securite/electrosmog/smart-meters-correcting-gross-misinformation.html

Red blood cells are affected by microwave radiation from wireless smart meters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4JDEspdx58

Report warning about Smart Meters by Santa Cruz Public Health Advisor, Poki Namkung, MD: http://emfsafetynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Health-Risks-Associated-With-SmartMeters.pdf

UK Department of Health concerned about cancer risks associated with wireless “smart” meters: http://www.clickgreen.org.uk/news/national-news/121825-decc-confirms-talks-with-dept-of-health-over-smart-meter-risks.html

A graph with 67 studies that show health effects well below government limits and the corresponding effects of smart meters – See the following PDF, as well as the graphic:

Ron Powell Smart Meter Report

The above graphic shows that 67 peer-reviewed, repeated studies show significant health issues (e.g. cancer, tumours, infertility) at levels far below the government safety standards (grey line). The yellow line is what the standards should be if public safety is considered.

Brain cancer rates have doubled in Denmark for the past 10 years: http://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/spike-brain-cancer-denmark

Swedish brain cancer rates have increased by 30% since 2008:  http://www.stralskyddsstiftelsen.se/2014/10/increase-brain-tumors/

Thousands of studies showing links between EMF pollution and biological effects: http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/studies.asp

1981 NASA paper showing numerous health effects from non-thermal electromagnetic fields. NASA report on EMF effects on the human body

“Electromagnetism and Life” book by Robert O. Becker:  Robert O. Becker and Andrew A. Marino 1982 Electromagnetism and Life

Collection of over 6,000 studies showing biological impacts from EMF pollution: http://justproveit.net/studies

“A new scientific truth is not usually presented in a way to convince its opponents. Rather, they die off, and a rising generation is familiarized with the truth from the start.” – Max Planck, Originator of Quantum Theory and Nobel Prize winner in Physics

Journal of Neuroscience double-blind study showing evidence of electro-hypersensitivity (EHS): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21793784

2016 Study showing that Nocebo response is not an adequate explanation of EHS in many cases: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26369906   Read the full study here.

Proposed statement on electromagnetic hypersensitivity by the European Economic and Social Committee:    http://www.iemfa.org/wp-content/pdf/EESC-TEN559.pdf

A study shows Secondhand Radiation from Cell Phones is Considerable: http://emfsafetynetwork.org/?p=8621

Rebuttal by Dr. Carlo on the recent Danish cell phone study that states cell phones are safe: http://www.emf-health.com/reports-drcarlo-danishstudy.htm

A new study calls for cell phone radiation to be considered human carcinogen:  http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/10/10790

Italian Supreme Court rules that brain tumour is caused by cell phone: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/9619514/Mobile-phones-can-cause-brain-tumours-court-rules..html

Children’s brains absorb much higher amounts of microwave radiation than adults because of their thinner skulls. Their nervous systems are also easily damaged by EMF because they do not yet have the protection afforded by nerve cell myelination.

 

Summary of how EMF pollution affects each system of our body: http://emractionday.org/science

Use of fluorescent lighting leading to an increase in eye disease in developed countries:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222423/

Bee Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) can be partially explained by the increased microwave radiation in our environment from wireless technologies the past decade – a new study out of Switzerland: http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/?page_id=672

Governments and organizations that ban or warn against wireless technology: http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/?page_id=128

Chart showing numerous health effects from the laptop and iPad radiation: http://www.wifiinschools.com/science.html

Dr. Franz Adlkofer – Austrian Reflex Study showing genetic damage from cell phone microwave radiation – results were suppressed (see following video and Reflex graphics):    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9ycyWd8GMs

 

This study from Austria shows that 24 hours of mobile phone radiation causes as much DNA damage as 1,600 chest x-rays. The results were so damaging to the wireless industry that the scientist, Dr. Franz Aldkofer, was attacked from many angles. The results still stand though.

High school students in Denmark show how Wi-Fi affects biology: http://mastsanity.org/health-52/research/324-experiments-with-cress-in-9th-grade-attracts-international-attention-denmark-16th

Research on the health effects of cell phone masts/towers: http://www.respectpdx.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=5&Itemid=6

10 of 14 studies who significant biological effects from living next to a cell phone tower: Click here for studies.

Peer-reviewed, double-blind studies showing that electro-sensitivity is caused by wireless technologies: http://www.magdahavas.com/microwave-radiation-affects-the-heart-are-the-results-real-or-are-they-due-to-interference/ & http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/cordless-heart/

Smart Meters – Separating Fact from Fiction: http://www.es-uk.info/news/2012-02-10-fact-from-fiction.pdf

American Society of Environmental Medicine warns of health effects from EMF and RF radiation: http://aaemonline.org/emf_rf_position.html

This presentation by Dr. Martin Pall in Norway November 2014 shows that our understanding of the health effects of weak EMF’s is about to completely change.

A possible solution for radiation

Watch Dr. Marco Ruggiero talk about a possible solution for all kinds of radiation (from 27:30)

Dr. Marco Ruggiero – Unlocking Immortality – RAADFest 2018 from immortalis on Vimeo.

Dr. Marco Ruggiero – Unlocking Immortality – RAADFest 2018 from immortalis on Vimeo.

Mobile phone radiation and health risks

Mobile phone use and glioma risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ming Yang,^#1 WenWen Guo,^#2 ChunSheng Yang,^#3 JianQin Tang,⁴ Qian Huang,² ShouXin Feng,^1,* AiJun Jiang,¹XiFeng Xu,¹ and Guan Jiang^4,*

Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adams JA¹, Galloway TS¹, Mondal D¹, Esteves SC², Mathews F³.

Report of Partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation

Studies That Demonstrate Harmful Effects of EMFs Cellular DNA damage: single strand and double strand breaks in cellular DNA and oxidized bases in cellular DNA, leading to chromosomal and other mutational changes:

Glaser ZR, PhD. “Naval Medical Research Institute Research Report.” Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation. Report No. 2, revised. (June 1971). https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/750271.pdf. Accessed September 9, 2017.

Goldsmith JR. “Epidemiologic Evidence Relevant to Radar (Microwave) Effects.” Environmental Health Perspectives. Vol. 105, supplement 6. (December 1997): 1579-1587. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s61579.

Yakymenko IL, Sidorik EP, Tsybulin AS. “Metabolic Changes in Cells Under Electromagnetic Radiation of Mobile Communication Systems.” [Article in Russian] Ukrainskii Biokhimicheskii Zhurnal (1999). Vol. 83, no. 2. (March-April 2011): 20-28.

Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. “Origins and Consequences of DNA Damage in Male Germ Cells.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online. Vol. 14, no. 6. (June 2007): 727-733. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60676-1.

Hardell L, Sage C. “Biological Effects from Electromagnetic Field Exposure and Public Exposure Standards.” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. Vol. 62, no. 2. (February 2008): 104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.12.004.

Hazout A, Menezo Y, Madelenat P, Yazbeck C, Selva J, Cohen-Bacrie P. “Causes and Clinical Implications of Sperm DNA Damages.” [Article in French] Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. Vol. 36, no. 11. (November 2008): 1109- 1117. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.07.017.

Phillips JL, Singh NP, Lai H. “Electromagnetic Fields and DNA Damage.” Pathophysiology. Vol. 16, no. 2-3. (August 2009): 79-88. doi: 10.1016/j. pathophys.2008.11.005.

Ruediger HW. “Genotoxic Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields.” Pathophysiology. Vol. 16, no. 2-3. (August 2009): 89-102. doi: 10.1016/j. pathophys.2008.11.004.

Makker K, Varghese A, Desai NR, Mouradi R, Agarwal A. “Cell Phones: Modern Man’s Nemesis?” Reproductive BioMedicine Online. Vol. 18, no 1. (January 2009): 148-157. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60437-3.

Yakymenko I, Sidorik E. “Risks of Carcinogenesis from Electromagnetic Radiation and Mobile Telephony Devices.” Experimental Oncology. Vol. 32, no. 2. (June 2010): 54-60.

Yakymenko IL, Sidorik EP, Tsybulin AS. “Metabolic Changes in Cells Under Electromagnetic Radiation of Mobile Communication Systems.” [Article in Russian] Ukrainskii Biokhimicheskii Zhurnal (1999). Vol. 83, no. 2. (March-April 2011): 20-28.

Gye MC, Park CJ. “Effect of Electromagnetic Field Exposure on the Reproductive System.” Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine. Vol. 39, no. 1. (March 2012): 1-9. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2012.39.1.1.

Gye MC, Park CJ. “Effect of Electromagnetic Field Exposure on the Reproductive System.” Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine. Vol. 39, no. 1. (March 2012): 1-9. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2012.39.1.1.

Pall ML. “Electromagnetic Fields Act via Activation of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels to Produce Beneficial or Adverse Effects.” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. Vol. 17, no. 8. (August 2013): 958-965. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12088.

Pall ML. “Scientific Evidence Contradicts Findings and Assumptions of Canadian Safety Panel 6: Microwaves Act Through Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel Activation to Induce Biological Impacts at Non-Thermal Levels, Supporting a Paradigm Shift for Microwave/Lower Frequency Electromagnetic Field Action.” Reviews on Environmental Health. Vol. 30, no. 2. (May 2015): 99-116. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0001.

Hensinger P, Wilke E. “Mobilfunk-Studienergebnisse bestätigen Risiken Studienrecherche 2016-4 veröffentlicht.” Umwelt Medizin Gesellshaft. Vol. 29, no. 3. (2016).

Houston BJ, Nixon B, King BV, De Iuliis GN, Aitken RJ. “The Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Sperm Function.” Reproduction. Vol. 152, no. 6. (December 2016): R263-R276. doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0126.

Batista Napotnik T, Reberšek M, Vernier PT, Mali B, Miklavčič D. “Effects of High Voltage Nanosecond Electric Pulses on Eukaryotic Cells (In Vitro): A Systematic Review.” Bioelectrochemistry. Vol. 110. (August 2016): 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2016.02.011.

Asghari A, Khaki AA, Rajabzadeh A, Khaki A. “A Review on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and the Reproductive System.” Electronic Physician. Vol. 8, no. 7. (July 2016): 2655-2662. doi: 10.19082/2655.

Pall ML. “Chapter 7: How Cancer Can Be Caused by Microwave Frequency Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures: EMF Activation of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels (VGCCs) Can Cause Cancer Including Tumor Promotion, Tissue Invasion and Metastasis via 15 Mechanisms.” In Markov M (Ed). Mobile Communications and Public Health (pp 163-184). New York, CRC Press, 2018.

Pall ML. “Wi-Fi Is an Important Threat to Human Health.” Environmental Research. Vol. 164. (July 2018): 405-416. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.035.

Wilke I. “Biological and Pathological Effects of 2.45 GHz Radiation on Cells, Fertility, Brain and Behavior.” Umwelt Medizin Gesellschaft. Vol. 31, supplement 1. (2018): 1-32.

Lowered fertility, including tissue remodelling changes in the testis, lowered sperm count and sperm quality, lowered female fertility including ovarian remodelling, oocyte (follicle) loss, lowered estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone levels (that is sex hormone levels), increased spontaneous abortion incidence, lowered libido:

Glaser ZR, PhD. “Naval Medical Research Institute Research Report.” Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation. Report No. 2, revised. (June 1971). https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/750271.pdf. Accessed September 9, 2017.

Tolgskaya MS, Gordon ZV. Pathological Effects of Radio Waves, translated by B Haigh. New York/London, Consultants Bureau, 1973, 146 pages. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-8419-9.

Goldsmith JR. “Epidemiologic Evidence Relevant to Radar (Microwave) Effects.” Environmental Health Perspectives. Vol. 105, supplement (December 1997): 1579-1587. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s61579.

Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. “Origins and Consequences of DNA Damage in Male Germ Cells.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online. Vol. 14, no. 6. (June 2007): 727-733. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60676-1.

Hazout A, Menezo Y, Madelenat P, Yazbeck C, Selva J, Cohen-Bacrie P. “Causes and Clinical Implications of Sperm DNA Damages.” [Article in French] Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. Vol. 36, no. 11. (November 2008): 1109- 1117. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.07.017.

Makker K, Varghese A, Desai NR, Mouradi R, Agarwal A. “Cell Phones: Modern Man’s Nemesis?” Reproductive BioMedicine Online. Vol. 18, no 1. (January 2009): 148-157. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60437-3.

Kang N, Shang XJ, Huang YF. “Impact of Cell Phone Radiation on Male Reproduction.” [Article in Chinese] Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. Vol. 16, no. 11. (November 2010): 1027-1030.

Gye MC, Park CJ. “Effect of Electromagnetic Field Exposure on the Reproductive System.” Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine. Vol. 39, no. 1. (March 2012): 1-9. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2012.39.1.1.

Further links to studies on electrosmog

https://mdsafetech.org

https://magdahavas.com/lessons-from-the-interphone-study/

http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/clear-evidence-of-cancer-from-cell-phone-radiation-us-national-toxicology-program-releases-final-report-on-animal-study-1078348.htm

http://www.emrsa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/REFLEX-Final-Report.pdf

Prof. Trevor Marshall EMF Health Summit

https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20180709-glioma-increase-paper.asp

https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf

https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7520958029.pdf

https://www.electricsense.com/smart-meters-electromagnetic-radiation-money-and-your-health/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16541280

https://www.electricsense.com/emfs-electrical-wiring/

https://www.electricsense.com/treating-emf-impact/

https://www.electricsense.com/our-governments-say-emfs-are-safe-should-we-believe-them/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiwhO6zEkn4

https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf

https://www.electricsense.com/2145/look-at-the-facts-can-you-afford-to-delay-protecting-yourself-from-emfs/

https://www.investopedia.com/investing/which-industry-spends-most-lobbying-antm-so/

https://www.thenation.com/article/how-big-wireless-made-us-think-that-cell-phones-are-safe-a-special-investigation/

http://www.washington.edu/alumni/columns/march05/wakeupcall01.html

https://www.emf-portal.org/en/search/results?query=dna+damage+radio+frequency+radiation&categories%5B%5D=1&categories%5B%5D=4&languageIds%5B%5D=en

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19328536

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2092574/

https://ehtrust.org/science/whoiarc-position-on-wireless-and-health/

https://www.consumerreports.org/cell-phones/what-the-cell-phone-brain-cancer-study-means-for-you/

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(11)70147-4/fulltext?

https://www.bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Hardell-2017-Sec11-Update-Use_of_Wireless_Phones.pdf

http://emfsafetynetwork.org/harvard-doctor-warns-against-wi-fi-hazards/

https://emfscientist.org/images/docs/EMF_Scientist_Press_Release_5-1-2015.pdf

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2776019/

http://www.marioninstitute.org/electromagnetic-load-a-hidden-factor-in-many-illnesses/

https://bioinitiative.org/

In Sweden, neurosurgeon Leif Salford showed that a cell phone disrupts the blood-brain barrier within two minutes, and causes brain damage within two hours

In India, zoologist Neelima Kumar proved that a ten-minute exposure to a cell phone rendered honey bees completely unable to metabolize their food

In Spain, biologist Alfonso Balmori raised tadpoles on an apartment terrace near a cell tower. When shielded from the radiation, they all thrived; when exposed to the cell tower, the tadpoles all died

Top organisations doing research in EMFs and electro-smog

UK
ElectroSensitivity UK
Radiation Research Trust
Stop Smart Meters
Powerwatch
Electromagnetic Man

USA & Canada
EMF Safety Network
Smart Grid Awareness
Citizens for Safe Technology
Take Back Your Power
Microwave News
EMF analysis
Green Swan
The Ecological Options Network
EMR Policy Institute
Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
Environmental Health Trust
RF/EMF

Switzerland 
Elektrosmog Abschirmung

Germany
Diagnose Funk
WiFi in Schools

Australia
EMFacts

Research on feng shui

Top books on electromagnetic pollution